The typical Miranda Warnings read by a police officer when an individual is placed into custody include:
- You have the right to remain silent;
- Anything you say or do may be used against you in a Court of law;
The typical Miranda Warnings read by a police officer when an individual is placed into custody include:
In Michigan, pursuant to Michigan Compiled Law 791.234b, a prisoner who has a final order of deportation against him or her by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service may be paroled after serving at least 1/2 of the minimum sentence imposed by the Court. Persons who have been convicted of first degree homicide, second degree homicide, first degree criminal sexual conduct, second degree criminal sexual conduct, third degree criminal sexual conduct, and/or as a habitual offender are not eligible for this relief.
EtG (Ethyl Glucuronide) is a common urine test used by Courts to verify whether an individual on bond or probation has used alcohol in the past 3 to 5 days. EtG testing is usually performed at an outside agency which the Court deems reliable (such as JAMS, NOVA, DOTS, etc.). It is favored in many Courts in lieu of a breathalyzer test based upon how far back it can detect alcohol. A breathalyzer test or a blood test may only be able to detect alcohol for hours based upon the body’s rapid elimination of alcohol from the body. Alcohol is eliminated from the body at a rate of approximately 1 drink per hour.
A very common violation of probation allegation in Michigan and elsewhere is for using or testing positive for drugs or alcohol while on probation. The punishment for drug or alcohol related violation of probation can include one or a combination of any of the following: no sanction; added conditions of probation such as increased drug/alcohol testing, drug treatment, AA/NA meeting attendance, community service, etc.; extending the term of probation; requiring Adult Treatment Court program participation (if the Court has an Adult Treatment Court program); incarceration of various lengths up to the maximum allowable sentence that can be imposed.
Responsible ownership of dogs, cats, and other pets is enforced by local communities. The standards of a particular city may vary from other communities, and it is up to the pet owner to make sure that he or she is in compliance with what is allowed. Some communities view the following as either a civil infraction (a non-criminal offense that subjects the owner to a fine), a criminal offense (usually a misdemeanor punishable by up to 93 days in jail), or in some instances what is illegal in one community is acceptable in another community.
1. No vicious dogs. However, in some communities and with some businesses it may be allowable to have a guard dog, and it is up to the dog owner to see what is lawful. A police dog or law enforcement dog may be trained to bite or exhibit certain aggressive characteristics.
2. No excessively barking dogs.
The Michigan Parole Board is comprised of a ten member board, with each member appointed by the director of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). The Parole Board meets regularly to review cases and decide whether or not to grant applications for parole.
Generally, in order to become eligible for parole, a felony offender must serve the minimum sentence with the MDOC. Exceptions to this requirement include persons that successfully complete the MDOC SAI prisoner boot camp and after care program, certain drug offenses, and individuals who are pardoned or whose sentence is commuted by the Governor. Prisoners serving only a non indeterminate sentence (sentences that don’t contain both a minimum and maximum sentence, such as prisoners serving time for a felony firearm conviction or an individual serving a HYTA prison sentence) are not subject to parole board review, and are released from custody for that particular offense once the sentence is served.
A prisoner who is serving a life sentence (except for first degree, felony murder, or another similar natural life offense) is interviewed by the Michigan Parole Board only after the prisoner has served either 10 or 15 years of their sentence, depending upon the date of the offense. After the initial Parole Board review, if the life offense prisoner is denied parole, the Parole Board is required to review the case at five year intervals. The Michigan Parole Board has the discretion to parole eligible life offense once the prisoner has served 10 or 15 years if the sentencing Judge does not object. Parole eligible life offenders require a public hearing, input form the victim (if available), and vote of the entire Michigan Parole Board. In most other cases, the Michigan Parole Board decides the fate of a particular parole applicant by a panel of 3 Michigan Parole Board members.
Persons younger than 17 years old accused of delinquency often have their matter addressed by the juvenile Court system. Delinquency charges in most cases are not considered as criminal matters, although the charges often stem from behavior that would be prosecuted under criminal law if the person was an adult at the time of the offense. The emphasis of the juvenile Court system is rehabilitation and treatment, rather than punishment.
There are several important Statutory and Constitutional Rights that every person who is prosecuted in a Michigan Court for a criminal allegation has:
First, be familiar with the Judge, his or her Courtroom procedures, and how he or she tends to rule on issues. If the attorney seems unprepared for the Judge, the jury may have a false impression that the lawyer does not have confidence in his or her case which can spell doom for the Defendant. Sometimes a juror’s impression of who the better or more prepared lawyer is matters to how he or she weighs the evidence. In many cases the Prosecutor is very familiar with a particular Judge because the Prosecutor is assigned to the Judge. A Prosecutor that appears regularly before a certain Judge may form a friendship or rapport with the Judge, which may translate on the record.
There are Judges that have a disposition to lean towards the Prosecution even before the trial starts, which is based upon the Judge’s judicial philosophy, conservatism, worry as to public perception that the Judge is not tough on crime, belief that it is easier to rule for the Prosecution and the Prosecution’s position is less likely to be reversed, being jaded by what they see inside and outside the Courtroom, etc., etc. There are a few (not many) Judges that are pro Defense. There are, fortunately, many Judges who try to reach the right decision – regardless if the decision is for the Prosecution or Defense. The Judge assigned to a particular case is randomly assigned when the Court has more than one presiding Judge, and the likelihood of having the case reassigned to a different Judge is very low. Depending upon the circumstances a Defendant who draws a particular Judge is either lucky or unlucky. An individual who hires an experienced criminal defense lawyer can overcome a bad Judge draw.